dna database graphs against universal database

Instead they had to go to a court and say, let us do this genealogical work in a database where users have, you know, sort of specifically not opted back in or have failed to opt back in to law enforcement access. So the difference in this case is that law enforcement didn't have access to an open platform that any ordinary person could use. So overnight, this database went from 1.2 million open samples to zero. When there was a sort of backlash against the law enforcement use in that case, ultimately, GEDmatch decided to kind of put everybody back into a pool of, you know, kind of protected users. They had kind of put it out for the world to see. And they had agreed to make it kind of publicly available. And the difference in this case is that that database was about, at the time of the Golden State Killer case, was about 1.2 million users who had voluntarily uploaded their genetic information. And listeners may remember that name because that was the same database that was used when the Golden State killer case broke the first investigative genetic genealogy kind of law enforcement investigation. MURPHY: Well, law enforcement in Florida petitioned a court for a warrant to conduct a search or continue a genealogical search in a database known as GEDmatch. She focuses on forensic evidence and the criminal justice system. Most companies have guaranteed that they'll protect their users' genetic information, but experts say a recent case in Florida makes it clear this is not so certain.Įrin Murphy is a professor at New York University's law school. The idea is to send in your saliva and receive data on your ethnic heritage or even get connected with long lost cousins. Consumers have flocked to buy DNA kits from popular sites like 23andMe and.

Dna database graphs against universal database